Culham Research Group
Just another blogs.reading.ac.uk site
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Advent Botany
    • Advent Botany 2014
    • Advent Botany 2015
    • Advent Botany 2016
    • Advent Botany 2017
    • Advent Botany 2019
    • Taxonomic index to #AdventBotany
  • PhD Students
    • Ahmed Gawhari – PhD 2016
    • Ana Simoes
    • Anas Tawfeeq
    • Azi Jamaludin
    • Donald Zulu
    • Jordan Bilsborrow
    • Maria Christodoulou – PhD 2016
    • Tomos Jones
    • Widad Aljuhani – PhD 2015
    • Kálmán Könyves – PhD 2014
    • Marshall Heap – PhD 2014
    • Ahmed El-Banhawy
    • Hassan Rankou
    • Oli Ellingham
    • Aramide Dolapo Oshingboye – L’Oreal Visiting Fellowship 2014/2015
  • Projects
← Mrs Katherine Murray Lyell at RNG
2015 Powdery Mildew Survey Results →

Powdery mildew morphological glossary

Posted on November 30, 2015 by Oliver Ellingham

Alongside the identification of the host plant, certain morphological features (i.e. the appearance) are extremely useful when attempting to narrow down the potential identity of powdery mildew specimens. These features have been used to help identify samples sent in to the Powdery Mildew Citizen Science Scheme. Coupled with data of their hosts and DNA from specific regions a final identification is possible in approximately 90% of cases.

Asexual features:

Powdery mildews are most often found in their asexual stage and can generally be found from spring to autumn. PMs like many other organisms can reproduce without sex, in this particular case by the production special spores.

Important microscopic features include:

Type of conidiogenesis 

Fig. 1: the ‘false-spore’ Pseudoidium-type is characterised by the production of  just one single maturing spore, a conidium, at a time, which will detach from the conidiophore before production of the next conidium. This is seen in the Erysiphe, Leveillula, Phllactinia, and Pleochaeta genera.

The ‘true-spore’ Euoidium-type is characterised by the production of multiple maturing spores attached to the conidiophore at once. This is seen in the Arthrocladiella, Blumeria, Cystotheca, Golovinomyces, Neroerysiphe, Sawadaea, and Podosphaera genera.

Figure 1: Conidiogenesis types of powdery mildew fungi. Left: Pseudoidium-type  Right: Euoidium-type. Photos by O. Ellingham.

Figure 1: Conidiogenesis types of powdery mildew fungi. Left: Pseudoidium-type Right: Euoidium-type. Arrows point to the most mature conidium. Bars = 10 µm. Photos by O. Ellingham.

 

Fibrosin bodies

These appear as glass-shard-like structures within individual spores of some species (Fig. 2). Most commonly, fibrosin bodies are not present. However they can be seen in the genera Podosphaera, Cystotheca, and Sawadaea (all of tribe Cystotheceae), which is helpful in identification.

Figure 2: Left: Spores absent of fibrosin bodies. Right: Spores with the shard-like fibrosin bodies. Photos by O. Ellingham.

Figure 2: Left: Spores absent of fibrosin bodies. Bar = 50 µm. Right: Spores with the shard-like fibrosin bodies. Arrow points to a fibrosin body within a conidium. Bar = 100 µm. Photos by O. Ellingham.

 

Conidial shape

This can also be important in delimiting the potential genera and species in powdery mildew ID. The varying forms can often be difficult to differentiate between and range from ellipsoid, ovoid, cylindrical, doliiform (barrel-shaped), lanecolate, ovoid-lanceolate, spathulate, clavate, dumbell-like, macro- and micro-conidia (of Sawadaea).

Sexual features:

The sexual stage of the powdery mildew is more rare; it can be found throughout the year although is most common from late-autumn to early-spring; winter perennation. The chasmothecium is a protective, shell-like structure which fungi use for overwintering containing sexual ‘ascospores’. Important microscopic features include:

Appendage shape

Fig. 4: Appendages of the chasmothecia (fruiting bodies) enable the structure to adhere to various plant surfaces such as leaves, stems, and bark. Viewing these beautiful structures can help to identify a powdery mildew to genus.

Dichotomously-branched appendages can be characteristic of the Podosphaera genus or Eryipshe sect. Microsphaera, needle-like appendages are characteristic of the Phyllactinia genus, branched, uncinate-circinate appendages are characteristic of the Sawadaea genus; uncinate-circinate appendages can also be characteristic of the genus Podosphaera as well as Erysiphe sect. Uncinula; simple-mycelioid appendages characteristic of the Golovinomyces and Leveillua genera and Erysiphe sect. Erysiphe.

Figure 4: Clockwise from top-left: Dichotomously-branched appendages seen on chasmothecium; dichotomously-branched appendage; needle-like appendages seen on chasmothecium; detached needle-like appendages; branched, uncinate-circinate appendages seen on chasmothecium; uncinate-circinate appendages seen on chasmothecium; simple-mycelioid appendages seen on chasmothecium. Photos by O. Ellingham.

Figure 4: Clockwise from top-left: Dichotomously-branched appendages seen on chasmothecium; dichotomously-branched appendage; needle-like appendages seen on chasmothecium; detached needle-like appendages; branched, uncinate-circinate appendages seen on chasmothecium; uncinate-circinate appendages seen on chasmothecium; simple-mycelioid appendages seen on chasmothecium. Arrows point to the appendages. Bars = 50 µm. Photos by O. Ellingham.

 

Number of asci within each chasmothecium, and the number of ascospores found within each ascus

Fig. 5 – these features are also useful features for further species delimitation. Asci within a single chasmothecium can range from one (characteristic of the genus Podosphaera) to many, while the each ascus can contain anything from 4-8 ascospores.

Figure 5: Both images show chasmothecia containing mutiple asci with 4 ascospores in each. Photos by O. Ellingham.

Figure 5: Both images show chasmothecia containing mutiple asci with 4 ascospores in each. Arrows point to the asci. Bars = 100 µm. Photos by O. Ellingham.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Email
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Print
  • More
  • Reddit
  • Google

Like this:

Like Loading...

About Oliver Ellingham

PhD student at the University of Reading. Working on ID techniques of powdery mildew Fungi. Interested in mycology, plant pathology and arboriculture.
View all posts by Oliver Ellingham →
This entry was posted in PhD research, Public Engagement with Science, RHS research and tagged #PowderyM, Citizen Science, Erysiphaceae, Erysiphales, Glossary, Oli Ellingham, Oliver Ellingham, Powdery Mildew. Bookmark the permalink.
← Mrs Katherine Murray Lyell at RNG
2015 Powdery Mildew Survey Results →
Logging In...

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • 2 Replies
  • 0 Comments
  • 0 Tweets
  • 0 Facebook
  • 2 Pingbacks
Last reply was June 19, 2017
  1. 2015 Powdery Mildew Survey Results | Culham Research Group
    View December 17, 2015

    […] I have tried to keep results simple and exciting as far as possible. However some terms and language used in the responses may be unfamiliar. As such please see the additional glossary post. […]

    Reply
  2. Garden Menu: What's good in the garden in mid June?
    View June 19, 2017

    […] To be fair I didn’t delve any deeper than that, but the explanation of that lot is available at Powdery Mildew Morphological Glossary. […]

    Reply
  • Recent Posts

    • A personal reflection on Wild about Weeds – author Jack Wallington
    • Community fungal DNA workshop
    • #AdventBotany 2019 Day 6: Deck the Halls with Boughs of Holly…
    • Final call: help identify potentially invasive plants
    • #AdventBotany 2019 Day 2: Death by chocolate
  • Recent Comments

    • Specimens, Specimens: Uses | Herbarium World on Brief notes on some Percival Wheats
    • Tendrils: 151218 – The Unconventional Gardener on Advent Botany 2015 – Day 15: Mahleb
    • Tendrils: 151218 – The Unconventional Gardener on Advent Botany 2015 – Day 17: Sgan t’sek
    • Tomos Jones on A personal reflection on Wild about Weeds – author Jack Wallington
    • Future Invaders in your Garden? – The Gardening Zoologist on Future invaders at RHS Chelsea
  • Categories

    • Advent
    • Art
    • Catalogue of Life
    • Collectors
    • e-learning
    • Hawkins Research Group
    • Herbarium RNG
    • i4Life
    • MSc Plant Diversity
    • PhD research
    • Public Engagement with Science
    • RHS research
    • Type
    • Uncategorized
    • Welcome
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
    • RSS - Posts
    • RSS - Comments
  • Subscribe to Blog via Email

    Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
    To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Culham Research Group
Proudly powered by WordPress.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: