Outdoor Education: Improving attainment, confidence and aspirations of young people

My UROP placement took place during the second year of a three year intervention study, aiming to investigate whether outdoor adventure activity camps could improve students who were underachieving in school.

It has been identified that in the UK, students from the lowest social economic areas continue to underachieve in education. The staggering statistic from 2009 revealed that only 27% of young people eligible for Free School Meals achieved 5 passes at GCSE, compared to 54% of those who were non-eligible (Office of National Statistics, accessed 2011). This can have knock on effects with children from low socio-economic areas less likely to carry on with their education passed GCSEs.

This project presented a new initiative to change this trend by introducing an outdoor education initiative. As a Psychology student, working on a project within the Institute of Education was a bit out of my comfort zone. However, the topic really appealed to me and the research aimed to improve the school lives of children in low social economic areas so I was interested in working on the project. Under the supervisor of Dr Carol Fuller, I was able to experience a number of valuable data collection and analysis techniques. At the start of the project, we visited Ufton Adventure Camp, where the ten student volunteers were carrying out their third residential stay at the camp. We joined them on the Saturday morning whilst they were working together to cook and clean up during breakfast. A student showed me around the camp and talked me through what he had learnt and what he had enjoyed the most about the camp from previous visits. We joined the group on a mountain bike session before returning home. I made some notes on the observations I had made during the visit. One student opened up to me about how he thought at first the camps were pointless but now saw the bigger picture and realised how they could benefit him. Some students were harder to talk to and wouldn’t initiate conversation with me but it was interesting to see how the students communicated with each other and worked together on the activities. The staff had built up a rapport with the students and worked on the basis of mutual respect, which I think was really important to the gains the students made whilst at the camp.

After the camp visit, I learnt to use nVIVO  software to code interviews that had been carried out with the students before the recent camp visit. The semi-structured interviews aimed to gain information from the students about their thoughts towards Ufton and any changes they had noticed in themselves e.g. behaviour and attainment, between camp visits.  After reading through the qualitative data, I drew up some themes from the text and after checking them over with my supervisor, coded them using nVIVO. The main themes of attainment in school, confidence in work and social situations and ambition arose and the majority of student felt that such factors improved for them due to the skills and experiences they had had at Ufton. This was a really promising find as it supported the hypothesis of the study and demonstrated the positive impact that camp visits had on the students. It was also interesting to see in what way each student felt the camps benefitted them, for example, meeting new people helped to improve their social skills and confidence, trying new activities encouraged them to try new things or discover new skills and being chosen for the study made them want to get the most out of the experience and make their teachers proud.

I also used SPSS to code and reverse code data from a questionnaire also given to the students before the recent camp visit. The data supported the interviews, with the students rating their experiences, behaviour, future ambitions and school life. During this time I read up on the benefits of qualitative and quantitative data and combing both data types together, as in this study, to understand why each data collection was used. Following this, I prepared the next set of questionnaires for the students, which we presented to them on a school visit after the camp.

This data will be compared to the previous questionnaire data to assess any changes since the third camp visit. To finish off my placement, I will be assisting with the Raising Aspirations and Achievement: the Role of the Outdoors Conference, which will take place at the University of Reading in October. I will help to organise the event, assist visitors and co-ordinate the students from our study during the conference.

My UROP placement experience was very valuable and I have learnt a lot about different methods of data collection, which will benefit me in my final year at University. I also thoroughly enjoyed getting involved with a subject that was out of my subject area as it was not only very interesting but also gave me an insight into the education sector, an area which I would like to work in in the future. The placement allowed me to help with research that could actually make a difference to the lives of young people so I felt valued too. Thank you Dr Fuller for allowing me to help with your research and teaching me lots of new research skills and techniques!

Sophie Marder

UROP: Exploring the reasons behind the differences between anxious and non-anxious children…

Along with PhD student Suzannah who designed the study, I used several different tasks to investigate attention bias and interpretation bias in young children aged 4-8 years who were highly anxious. Upon entering our “space lab”, the child participants began “astronaut training” which allowed the research to be a fun experience for both the participants and I. It has enabled me to learn many things, for example, how to use facial electromyography (fEMG) equipment to record the children’s “smiley” and “angry” muscles (real names are the zygomaticus and the corrugator if you’re interested) and how to use the eye tracking computer “Tobii”.

Before we were able to collect our data we needed to find participants. This was one of my main jobs. I have lost count of the amount of flyers and posters that I have printed and distributed to libraries, museums, soft play centres and various other places we thought parents and children might appear over the summer holidays. I then liaised with parents who showed interest and invited them in to the department if their child matched our pre-screening criteria.

Another main part of my placement was data input which I surprisingly really enjoyed. Keeping things organised and being productive is something I love to do, so scoring and coding questionnaire inputs and demographic information into numerous excel spreadsheets and SPSS worksheets wasn’t as mundane as you’d expect.

I feel that this UROP placement has been such an amazing opportunity and has enabled me to fully understand the research process which involves many more stages than I first expected. I definitely improved my problem solving skills during the piloting stages of the study as things often didn’t go to plan, and as a consequence, my team working skills have also developed as I have been working closely with Suzannah to make the experiment run as successfully as possible. The main thing I will take away from this is that it has helped me consolidate my beliefs and hopes to pursue a career with children in a clinical setting in the future as working with young, anxious participants was really rewarding.

Vicky Milner

Orthography and Vocabulary Learning

It has been shown that the presence of orthography (the written form of a word) is beneficial when children learn new vocabulary. The study I have been working on for UROP aims to address a gap in the literature over whether drawing attention to the presence of the written word aids learning even further. To do this, we worked with Year 5 pupils, teaching them new words and assessing their learning over a period of three weeks.

We began by carrying out background testing using several standardised assessments of reading and nonverbal reasoning etc. and the participants were then sorted into ability matched groups. We taught the children 16 new words in the format of a pre-test and training session on week one, another training session in week two and an assessment session in week three. These were words that a lot of adults don’t know, such as luminary and epigram; I only knew one myself beforehand (though after teaching them to so many children they now seem like basic vocabulary!) so it’s easy to imagine what a daunting task this was for 9 and 10 year old children. This is where the ability to work well with children and get them motivated was absolutely crucial.

Currently we are halfway through the sample and will be returning to schools in September to complete the project, with initial results looking very promising. There have been some hiccups (as is expected), but it should run smoothly in the next round of testing. This project is linked to a larger project in secondary schools and I have enjoyed having the chance to discuss ways in which this experimental procedure could be adapted in the future.

Working with Prof. Ricketts and Nicola Dawson has been very rewarding. They have been incredibly helpful, answering all my questions and giving me the opportunity to experience multiple aspects of conducting a research project. The chance to work with a fully qualified Speech and Language Therapist (which I am studying to be) has also been an unexpected bonus. My initial motivation for applying for a UROP project was to see whether research is something I would enjoy doing in future and already at this stage of the project, I can definitely say that this is something I would love to do.

Rachel Tomkinson