Ruvi Ziegler talks about the Israeli government’s plan to reform the judicial system

The invite to the interview was prompted by the following quote from Ruvi posted in the Jewish News

‘‘The Israeli government states that it seeks to ‘reform’ Israel’s legal system. In reality, the legal changes it seeks to implement will significantly weaken constitutional review of human rights violations, leaving Israel’s already vulnerable minorities subject to the exercise of untrammelled power by its majority.” He said the changes would also “undermine the independence of the judiciary by altering a long-standing balanced Judicial Appointment Committee, handing over absolute power to the government of the day.” ”Given the severity of the threat to Israel’s democratic character, it is vital to speak out against these dangerous proposals.’’

Listen to Ruvi’s interview on Good Morning Scotland

The segment starts at 1h 45min in.

New University Research Awards open for entries

Entries are encouraged from all research themes and associated professional functions (for example technical staff, museums staff, research services staff) across the University.

The awards are open to individuals or groups and activities of any scale will be welcome.

Winners will receive £1000 towards their next engagement activity.

Entries must be received by 12 noon on Friday 31 March.
Please read the entry guidelines and eligibility criteria fully before entering at:research.reading.ac.uk/engagement-and-impact/2023- research-awards/

Ruvi Ziegler is quoted widely on recent protests outside Israel’s London Embassy against the Israeli government’s planned legal reforms

Dr Ruvi Ziegler is quoted by The GuardianYahoo!Arab NewsNews Deal, Jewish News (in print), and The Observer (in print) on recent protests outside Israel’s London Embassy against the Israeli government’s planned legal reforms.

Ruvi is quoted in the above sources as saying:

“The demonstrations are a very patriotic act because they are an attempt to save Israel from making substantive mistakes that would ultimately change its character. They are anything but hostile to the Israeli state.

Since this government was formed, it has given many reasons for people in the diaspora to find themselves alienated from it.

In the past, faced with certain expressions of antisemitism, many Jews have felt the need to defend Israel, right or wrong. That sentiment may be weakening, but ultimately the blame for that lies squarely with the current government.”

 

Professor Marko Milanovic – ‘Revisiting Coercion as an Element of Prohibited Intervention in International Law’

In his inaugural lecture delivered on Wednesday 22nd February 2023, Professor Milanovic argued that coercion can be understood in two different ways or models. First, coercion as extortion, as a threat to engage or continue engaging in some activity (which itself may be lawful or unlawful) in order to extract some kind of concession from the victim state – in other words, an act targeting the victim state’s will or decision-making calculus. Second, coercion can be understood as the actual deprivation of the victim state’sability to make its sovereign choices, which may be done even through acts like cyber operations that the victim state may be unaware of. Professor Milanovic argued that many of the difficulties surrounding the notion of coercion arise as consequence of failing to distinguish between these two different models.

Follow the link below to listen to Marko’s lecture delivered on Wednesday 22nd February 2023.

Revisiting Coercion as an Element of Prohibited Intervention in International Law

Key court challenge to powers of Minister of Home Affairs stripping South Africans of their citizenship looms

An identity document is scanned. (Photo: Deaan Viviers/Gallo Images/Foto24)|People wait in long queues at Soweto Regional Home Affairs Office(Photo by Gallo Images/Fani Mahuntsi)|The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein.Photo:Supplied| Minister of Home Affairs Aaron Motsoaledi.(Photo by Gallo Images/Frennie Shivambu)

 

Read the op-ed by David Bilchitz and Ruvi Ziegler published by the Daily Maverick.

Reading Law School Building Cyber Law Capacity Globally

For nearly three years, Reading Law School has been working with the governments of Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and Singapore, as well as Cyber Law International, to offer training for diplomats, military officers, legal advisers, and other government officials on the international law governing cyberspace. Initially, that training was provided online due to the COVID pandemic.  In 2022, however, two Reading Law School professors have taken the program, which is certified as Executive Education by the School, on the road.

The training consists of four programs. The flagship course is the Executive Course, a broad survey of relevant law that ranges from general law subjects like sovereignty and intervention to specialized legal regimes such as diplomatic law and international humanitarian law. Directed by Professor Mike Schmitt, with Professor Marko Milanovic also serving as an instructor, the course was offered virtually for Southeast Asia in January, Africa in August, and the Middle East and Africa in September. In October, the team traveled to the Dominican Republic to conduct an in-person course for officials from members of the Organization of American States. The following month, the course was offered in Ghana for African officials. Finally, in December, the program closed with an in-person course in Singapore for members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

The second course examines how international human rights law governs activities in cyberspace and is directed by Professor Marko Milanovic. It is a very deep dive into the human rights implications of cyber operations. The course was offered virtually twice, once for officials from the Americas and the second for those from Africa.

Reading Law School also certified two regional Alumni Seminars conducted by Professors Milanovic and Schmitt and a Cyber Law International instructor for previous graduates of the aforementioned courses. The first was conducted with the collaboration of the Organization of American States in the Dominican Republic, with the second in Singapore at that nation’s new Cyber Security Agency’s training facility.

Finally, the program includes bespoke events. For example, a specialized Women in Cyber seminar was offered to officials worldwide this year.

Today, the program is widely considered to be the global gold standard in cyber law capacity-building. It continues in 2023, with the first course being an Executive Course offered in collaboration with the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe; to be held in North Macedonia in February, the course will be open to officials from the Balkan States.

 

University of Reading Law School to Offer Advanced Training to British Army

The University of Reading has been selected from among British Universities to deliver advanced law of armed conflict training for officers of the British Army Legal Service (ALS). Offered over two weeks in February at Reading’s Greenlands Campus, the program will be delivered by Professors Mike Schmitt and Mako Milanovic, as well as Drs. Alison Bisset and Alex Gilder, a team that Major General Alex Taylor, the Director of ALS, has labeled “amazing”.

The program, which will be operationally focused, addresses peacekeeping, U.N. Charter law governing the use of force, the initiation and termination of armed conflict under international law, targeting law, human rights during periods of conflict, war crimes, and cyber operations. The course concludes with an exercise developed in collaboration with the US Military Academy at West Point’s Lieber Institute for Law and Warfare. Lectures by the faculty on their individual research complement the program’s curriculum. Since all the participants are serving legal advisers with broad practical experience, they will bring their own operationally-grounded perspectives to the program.

Prof Schmitt emphasized that the competitive selection of Reading Law School to deliver the program acknowledges its emergence as a globally influential venue for critical thinking on the law governing armed and other forms of conflict. It complements the work of “Global Law at Reading” in advancing Reading’s contribution to the understanding and development of international law.