Google Scholar for searching

There are many databases available for academic searching, and there is a list of those available to University of Reading users.

Google Scholar is a good overarching tool for searching through a number of these, via the preferences you can tell Google up to three libraries you are a member of and in return it will show you where the full text is available at those libraries, if you are off-campus you will need to authenticate to get access (details of how to do this at the library site). It will also show if the materials are available in institutional repositories such as Centaur.

However if like me you are interested in research on Twitter you will have difficulties as Google Scholar throws up all articles on pages which have buttons that say things like “Share this on Twitter” as well as those with Twitter in the title or text.

There is an earlier post on Google Scholar Citations which may be of interest.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Digital dissent

I follow several electronic newsgroups to ensure I stay at the front of my research interests. The ever challenging issue of science on Wikipedia cropped up today with an unusually heated debate on the accuracy of information on a page and whether one of the sources cited was accurate in this instance versus ‘in general’. The debate was over a particular instance of arthropod classification – Arthropods include the insects so, by default, include most species of living things. In this case the debate was about possible mistakes in a supplying database that had resulted in the accidental/unintentional appearance of what seemed to be two new genera. Here is the link to the dispute: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Munididae&oldid=492504731

Why am I posting this?  Simple, most of my students use Wikipedia as a definitive source of information for their essays.  I keep telling them it isn’t. It is the opinion of the person willing to put 1) most time in and 2) who has editorial control of the page.  To me, the example above is one I will be using to illustrate my assertions 🙂

 

 

Posted in Digital community, Dissemination | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

A library in my pocket

One of the problems of being a plant taxonomist is that my research relies heavily on books, and some of those can be a few hundred years old.  My modest working book collection covers an entire wall of my office and another walll at home, and is therefore not very portable.  However technologies such as the Kindle, iPad and so on mean that I could now carry my library around on a device that would fit in a large pocket.  Screen reading does not have the same interactive and living feel that turning pages, the smell of paper, and the attachment to history  I find in reading a real book.  However virtual libaries provide me with books that are long out of print, very expensive or even unobtainable on the open market.  I now have access to huge specialist digital libraries through Biodiversity Heritage Library, Botanicus.org and Biodiversity Heritage Library Europe.  Sadly most of these have not had the resources to do more than covert paper to pdf but eventually these books will be annotated through notes and hyperlinks, indexed and become far more instantly practical resources.  A recent article in The Atlantic magazine, entitled ‘In defense of the Kindle‘ stimulated me to think more about my interactions with virtual books and realise the benefits as well as the disadvantages.

Posted in Digital community | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Online professionalism and Facebook – Falling through the generation gap

Via a tweet I found this recently published article:

Osman, A., Wardle, A. & Caesar, R. (2012) Online professionalism and Facebook – Falling through the generation gap. Medical teacher. Available online at: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668624

Although the survey reported is about medical professionals a lot of the findings are comparable across other disciplines and their conclusions are worth sharing with anyone interested in digital readiness:

“Professionals lack awareness of their professional vulnerability online. They are not careful in restricting access to their posted information and are not mindful that the principles of professionalism apply to SNSs.”

At the heart of all such conclusions must be the fact that nowadays your identity is made up of how you act in face-to-face situations and how you act online, it is not possible to draw a fence around one and say that is different.

So if we think it is important to educate our staff and students about professionalism we shouldn’t separate out “online” and leave it to be dealt with separately, later or not at all.

We should also remind them it isn’t possible to draw complete bounds between our professional identities and our private ones.

Multiple identities

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Behaving Online

There is lots of advice available on how to behave online, some of it very sensible and some of it belonging to the 19th century. The University has produced two guides on Being Online one for students and one for staff, these are aimed at expectations surrounding the use of what is termed “Web 2.0”. The This is Me project aimed to produce sets of guides as to how material online impacted on what we call your Digital Identity.

Etiquette is something different it is about often unwritten rules and social norms of ethical behavior within a community. A person’s general ethos may not change within different communities but awareness of the norms usually does, we act differently with our friends to how we act with family or colleagues. Online these boundaries can become blurred, emails can be forwarded, tweets seen many.

The most basic rule of online etiquette must be to always think before you send. If on reflection you think a post may:

  • get you the sack,
  • lead to legal action,
  • hurt your grandmother’s feelings,

and this was not your intention, then don’t send it.

What other advice should staff and students share with each other about the online etiquette relating to being within the university?

 

Posted in Social media | 3 Comments

Peer learning – Google Scholar Citations

This afternoon one of those serendipitous conversations happened that allowed me to add another online profile to my digital presence; Google Scholar now offer individual academic profiles that update automatically, can be edited and keep track of an individual’s publications, and their collaborations. It took about 15 minutes to set up my profile and that included finding a new image to go on the web – my Harris garden photo is now about 8 years old – how good to stay looking young 🙂

A single profile from Google Scholar Citataions

A single profile from Google Scholar Citations

Other colleagues on Google Scholar Citations include Jim Dunwell who introduced me to the system, and Liam Mc Guffin who works in an area with very highly cited papers. I’m pleased to see Pat Parslow but surprised Shirley Williams is not there – I’ve finally beaten our super-techie to a new platform 🙂 [not for long! Shirley now has a profile. I love the photo – bringing glamour back in to science :-)].

Google Scholar Profiles even tracks down and links to publicly available copies of the publications.  It seems to me that much of the work done in our Centaur system is provided here without the need for a local infrastructure to support it.

Posted in Digital community, Dissemination, Employability | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

The Digital Human

The advantage of bank holidays is the chance to hear weekday Radio4 from time to time.  This afternoon at 4.30pm I happened to hear The Digital Human. This is week two of a series of six programmes investigating the impact of the digital world on how we live our lives. Today’s episode addressed the questions “Is control over one’s digital life an illusion? And what happens if control is lost?” Well worth a listen.

Posted in Social media | Tagged | Leave a comment

Facebook: Social integration and informal learning experiences

Continuing the theme of using social media, I thought I would give a plug to a project on ‘Enhancing Student Engagement in Curriculum Development’ here at the University of Reading. Amongst other things, the project explores the use of Facebook for student communication, to capture current practice, plans for the future, and staff and student perceptions of limitations and opportunities.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Saint or sinner?

We’
ve been hearing a lot recently about the need for a code of practice to guide our students in their use of web 2.0 and social media when part of their learning programme. This was a recurrent theme at last week’
s Teaching & Learning Showcase event on ‘Using technologies to engage students in their learning’
, hosted by the Centre for the Development of Teaching & Learning (CDoTL) here at the University of Reading.

Gerry Leonidas at the Teaching & Learning Showcase event on ‘Using technologies to engage students in their learning’, 24 April 2012

Speakers Kat Bicknell, Gerry Leonidas and Simon Burke shared their experiences of students collaborating on group wikis, taking part in a live poll, and using social media such as Facebook, Twitter and Yammer – and had a tale or two to tell.

Student feedback on such innovative uses of technology in T & L has been overwhelmingly positive, with active and enthusiastic participation from students in online activities. Yet some of the students’ online behaviour has been suprisingly anti-social and unprofessional, with some students less willing to share, overly critical, immature or downright rude.

Simon Burke, who hosted a debate where students were able to contribute via text message using Poll Everywhere and have their comments displayed live on the presentation screen, shared some of the messages that had to be filtered out by the moderator. With almost 50% of students’
 comments unsuitable for public consumption, he clearly had his work cut out for him.

Our students may be confident users of sites such as Facebook in their social lives but perhaps less sure about appropriate ways of sharing information online when it comes to their learning and professional activities. Many institutions now publish general guidance on ‘netiquette’ – see the Open University’s advice on ‘Working with others online’
 for an example, or our own ‘Expectations surrounding the use of Web 2.0’
 which touch on social conduct as well as ethical and legal considerations.

Published just today, this blog post by Jane Adams on ‘Facebook saints vs. Facebook sinners



’ offers her personal reflections on getting the most out of your interactions with family and friends on social media networks. But many of her points are actually about common sense and good manners. Her rough guide to Facebook habits – general tips and advice on posting basic information, status updates, photos, and ‘likes’ – applies equally to learning experiences and professional environments. A positive presence is as important online as it is in any other sphere of human interaction – it is, in fact, a life skill.

We are collating thoughts from our speakers and others to create draft ideas for a code of practice on the use of digital media – for colleagues to adapt to suit the learning outcomes and needs of their students. If you have any thoughts, suggestions or good examples to share, please post them in the comments box or email Maureen Martin at m.t.martin@reading.ac.uk.

 

 

Posted in Dissemination, Meetings & Events | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Using social media for employability

Recent studies have shown that students are comfortable using sites such as Facebook and Twitter in their social lives but feel less confident about applying those skills for learning.

Our own small-scale study, carried out in conjunction with our careers service SEECC, indicates that the same seems to be true for careers research, networking, engaging in discussions, and showcasing achievements – all crucial employability skills for our students in the digital age.

117 Reading students took part in the survey we conducted in February to find out  how our students are using social media for employability.

Nearly all respondents (98.3%; 115) stated that they are registered on social media sites. 96.6% (113) of students are signed up to Facebook, 50.4% (59) registered on Twitter, and 33.3% (39) using YouTube, with many students accessing their accounts on a daily or even hourly basis. However, only 13.7% (16) of students who took part in our survey have uploaded a profile on LinkedIn, the professional networking site recommended by many careers experts.

Only a small number of students are using social media for employability. For example, out of 115 students using Facebook only 10.4% (12) are using this site to search for jobs or work experience, 9.6% (11) for networking with potential employers, 16.5% (19) to research companies, 4.3% (5) to engage in professional discussions, and 3.5% (4) to showcase their academic profile.

Reasons for not using social media sites in this way include students’ perceptions of those sites as purely social platforms, concerns about employers seeing their profiles, and uncertainty regarding how social media sites could help them with their careers.

Students come to university already familiar with social media which, with a little guidance, could give them another string to their bows when it comes to finding work experience and graduate jobs, and in their professional development. In February, Em Sowden, Senior Placement and Development Manager here at Reading, ran a session on ‘Using social media for employability’.

As Em explained, recruiters expect applicants to have a professional online presence. Employers are increasingly and actively using social media as an instant, cheap medium to find and recruit proactive job seekers. Em recommends Twitter and LinkedIn to help students and graduates conduct research on companies they are interested in, as well as connecting with recruiters, building contacts and discovering or even creating employment-related opportunities. Her presentation and top tips can be found here.

The Digitally Ready team are working with SEECC to look at ways of engaging students so that they can take full advantage of the capabilities of social media to raise their professional profile.

Posted in Employability, Training & resources | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments